The horse is dead. Long live the horse.

Thursday, August 07, 2008

20080807

The other day at work we got the cutest letter in the world. As readers may know, the place of my employ frequently gets questions of theological import from our users. These can be fun, tedious, sad, or enlightening. This particular one is among my favourites. I'll let it speak for itself:

Hello. I am sixteen. I have remained pure (no kissing, sex, boy-on-girl contact) for all of my life for my future wife, even writing letters to her to help myself. Now, I am afraid that I will not be able to be married and experience that joy before God comes for us. My question is, will there be marriage to one another in Heaven, or will we all just be friends, so to speak?

Poor kid. It's hard to really wanna say "Maranatha!" when you're a virgin. Not that the evangelical church makes it that easy on kids either, by constantly threatening the End Times.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

20080610

With the advent of AJAX and the rise of the dorkily named and rather ambiguous Web 2.0, we have a phenomenal means of tracking real historical change over short increments of time. Case in point. Last week I was in Laguna Beach for an appointment. I decided to fill up at a gas station at 120 PCH right in the middle of the city. I paid an almost unbelievable $4.65 per gallon. I mean, really. Wow.

Gas!!

Anyway, I was thinking about it and I thought I'd check to see what the price of gas was about six months ago at the same station. So I did. My first and only stop? Google Maps. The first time I saw PCH in Laguna featured on their street view mode was made last fall or so. It certainly wasn't summer or there'd be more people out, wandering the sidewalks, dodging bums with open guitar cases fiddling their saxaphones for a buck or three.

Anyway, I quickly discovered the gas station in question.

120 PCH!!

And with a little google zooming...

Money!!

$2.91. Wow, I remember back when that was a lot. Actually, who doesn't? It was, after all, less than a year ago. Go America!! Go Google!! Go Web 2.0!!

Labels: , ,

Monday, October 15, 2007

20071015

Thanks to the joys of Comics Curmudgeon, I've been able to invest new interest into several comics strips that I used to read back in the day when news was gathered from paper products. One of the more intriguing strips for me to catch up with has been Funky Winkerbean. Tom Batuik, the author, is just ruthless with his characters. Here's a typical strip.

So recently, Batuik slew off the wife of series hero, Les, as she engaged mano-y-mano in dread battle with the infamous cancer monster. Essentially, that battle went down just like every battle with the cancer monster does. Les' wife Lisa spent bald and painful months of deteriorating health before finally succumbing on 4 October 2007. But that's not what I want to talk about.

I want to talk about the future.

The next day of the strip, Batuik brings us into the future. Ten years into the future. Les is wearing glasses that weren't a product of the mid eighties. He has a goatee and looks like a psychologist. Ironically, we find him reclined on a psychologist's couch as he reccounts the agony of days immediately following Lisa's send-off. After this remembrance is finished, the narrative will presumably resume in future-Les' time, ten years hence.

A.D. 2017.

This is where Batuik has the opportunity to do som e awesome stuff. I mean, come on, it's 2017! We'll get to see a world populated by alien-human hybrids. Les' new wife will have the head of a crocodile. His psychologist to whom he's pouring his heart out will turn out to be a hologram of a robot generated by the World-Mind Computer that rules the world from Paris. Texas. Everyone will drive hovercars to work. Wally Winkerbean will now be more cyborg than human, having most of his body replaced after a second landmine accident left him a pulpy mess. Fortunately, the landmine blew off his cancerous prostate. And even more fortunate, he can now transform into a Celica.

In short, with anticipation building, I'm hotly looking forward to just what technological wonders Batuik introduces with this new comics narrative - which he might as well retitle Funky Winkerbean vs. the Robot Apocalypse.

Labels: ,

Thursday, August 23, 2007

20070824

Wow.

I can't imagine what they'd do if they really had a troubled kid in one of there classes. I dodged a bullet by being born in 1973 instead of 1993. It's crazy what a difference 20 years can make.

It's almost enough to make one wanna homeschool.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, August 16, 2007

20070816

[[ WARNING: Hey there. Watch out. This post contains the kind of graphic (literally) violence, gore, and bloodshed that only a well-adjusted, action-loving, horror-movie-watching fifteen year old can produce. Consider yourself warned. ]]

Okay, so here's the thing. If my daily behaviour as a youth in America's high schools appears in any child these days, that child will likely be expelled. And the thing? That thing I mentioned when I said, "Here's the thing"? The thing is: I was a good kid.

What was the problem then? I liked to draw. What? Surely that is not enough to merit expulsion. True enough. There is a caveat. I liked to draw what kids my age and of a typical disposition might like to draw if they had the ability. Okay, well, no. I didn't draw boobs. Because, well, I figured that would a) get me in trouble, and b) give me the title and distinction of Class Perv (something that, astonishingly enough, was not a distinction I cared to cultivate). What I did draw (as alluded to in the last post) were gunfights and scenes of mayhem.

The plain fact of the matter is that everyday and in every class (save for P.E., alas), I, in my authority as the artist, killed by the fistful. I was lord over a domain of death. Not only did I engage my doodles in simple firefights, but I subjected my creations to beheadings, impalements, internal combustion, acids, and, well, squirshings. Among other fates. This was partly because I found that drawing things I would hopefully never see was adventurous and partly because my classmates egged me on, cheering the imaginative ways in which I brought to a close the lives of two dimensional persons.

There was nothing wrong with me. I was a quiet, well-adjusted kid who was both good-natured and friendly (if a bit shy). I mean, sure I occasionally wore a bathrobe to school and sometimes wore all flannel because I knew how atrocious a decision that would be. Still, I grasped full-well that the drawings I created bore no import in the world of flesh and of blood. They were not worlds in which I immersed myself in order to escape from the tortures of a world that was too cruel to me (i.e., the real world*). I did not harbour secret desires to slaughter the jocks, make the cheerleaders pray to me before I drown them in a hail of gunfire, hog-tie the rich kids in overtly homo-erotic poses in order to shame them forever. There wasn't really anyone at school I didn't like.

Well, maybe the fat kid. I was, after all, still a kid.

For some reason, though, nowadays teachers and principles and authorities have been taught that violent games or stories or drawings are a critical first sign that a kid is gonna go wrong. That he is gonna take the Harris/Klebold route to fame and a messy exit. I'm not sure I know what happens to us. When do we cross the line from kids to reactionary adults who just really don't at all remember what it was like. Does this happen when we become parents? Is that when we stop remembering that kids aren't completely stupid (even if they act like it), that they can handle the things in the dark as well or sometimes better than we can?

I don't know why that is, but here is my evidence to you. I am a variously hard-worker in a respectable profession. I treat people who are different from me with respect (except for when I'm poking fun at them). I love my family. I love my friends. I work for a non-profit organization. I volunteer to work with children. I read books. I even sometimes understand them. I sing songs in the shower. I want a dog (maybe a Welsh Corgi). I drive an environmentally friendly vehicle. I don't like poetry. I think I'd make a good father. I've only been in one fight (juniour high and it was a wrestling fight not a fist fight). I'm patient and easy-going. I'm not violent (though I play at it when frisky). I would never join the military by choice. And these are a small sampling of the stuff I would draw daily in Math, English, and History (and of course, you may click on the below images to see the whole thing):

IBM presents: You Make the Call! What's the verdict? Should I be locked up as a potential killer? Was I only a step away from massacring untold tens of students and a teacher or three? Personally, I am far beyond dubious that such would be the case.

*NOTE: though not the MTV version - which hadn't come out yet - I full-well support those who create imaginary worlds in order to escape "reality" television.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

20070724

There was a joke on a Laffy Taffy wrapper that I admit to not understanding at all. Here, you give it a shot:

Q. Which Garden has the most vegetables?

A. Flash Garden.

Okay, so I get that its meant to be some sort of pun off of the name Flash Gordon, but I'm not sure what flash has to do with "the most vegetables." Any help?

Labels: ,

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Nowheresville?

Huh. I can see why I'd be the Number 1 result for it, but I can't for the life of me figure out why I've gotten such a jump on today's traffic (it'll probably settle at around 200-300% of my normal daily traffic) from people googling the term, "nowheresville." Can any visitors who searched their way here let me know what it was that you were looking for? A new movie? A funny video? A new philosophy of life? What?

Labels: ,

Monday, April 09, 2007

PCABCO: Protecting Us from the Mechanized Horde

You've got the touch...

Reading in the PCA's Book of Church Order, I came across this gem:

50-2. The reading of the Holy Scriptures in the congregation is a part of the public worship of God and should be done by the minister or some other person.

"By the minister or some other person"? Essentially, it seems, their primary concern is a) that the Word be read and b) that it not be read either by animals or inanimate objects. After due consideration, I suppose this is a valid concern with the gradual increase in society's reliance upon technological improvement. In fact, the foresight of the PCA's authorship is remarkable when considering the dawning robot menace. We've got to have the structures in place to deny artificial intelligences the same rights and privileges that we ourselves enjoy. And I'm glad to see that my denomination has taken this problem well in hand.

Labels: ,