The horse is dead. Long live the horse.

Monday, November 26, 2007

20071126

While we're on the subject of assumptive interpretations of Scripture, I've always found it amusing all the things that people consistently extrapolate out of the passage in which Jesus is asked about the lady who had seven husbands and which of those men would be married to her in heaven. Jesus responds that there is no marriage in heaven and that in such a respect we will then be like the angels.

Here then is a partial list of unjustified things that people derive from the passage:

  • Angels are sexless beings.
  • Angels cannot have sex.
  • Angels cannot reproduce.
  • In heaven, we will not have sex.
  • In heaven, we will be sexless beings.
  • In heaven, we will not reproduce.
  • At the most, here is what we can say about the text (note that none of the above make it into this category):

  • Angels don't marry.
  • In heaven, we will not marry.
  • And really, that's about it. Beyond those two things, there isn't much we can posit with anything remotely approaching dogmatism. We are fully justified in saying something like, "Wouldn't it be interesting if people became sexless in their resurrection bodies?" We are not justified in saying people will be sexless in their resurrection bodies." Note that difference and learn to love it.

    Labels: ,

    Tuesday, November 20, 2007

    20071121

    I was home sick today and had nothing better to do than read through some newly aquired graphic novels (the first one was read two weeks ago). Next week, I'll do a couple books and maybe a couple essays.


    Houdini: The Handcuff King

    Comic: Biographical.
    By Jason Lutes (author) and Nick Bertozzi (artist).
    96 pages.

    On a recent busride down to San Diego to view the Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit at the natural history museum, I figured it'd be good to bring some reading material. From my to-read pile I pulled the recently purchased Houdini: The Handcuff King. I was excited because I love Jason Lutes work (as previously seen in Jar of Fools and Berlin: City of Stones). And really, this book did not disappoint. There were, however, two surprises for me.

    Surprise #1: While Jason Lutes penned the story that comprises the book's narrative, he did not contribute to its art. Really this should not have been a surprise as the cover plainly says Nick Bertozzi immediately beneath Lutes own name and the art on the cover is plainly not the work of Lutes' established style. At first, this surprise was a disappointment to me - not unlike when you think your glass has Pepsi in it but your first sip reveals apple juice instead. But after my initial shock, I came to appreciate Bertozzi's line and recognize that he really was a good choice for the book.

    Surprise #2: I had brought a book to busy me during the ninety-minute drive, but had finished it within forty-five minutes. Houdini is not a long book. There is plenty to look at but little text per page, which makes it a fairly quick read. Wholly apart from disappointing, the brisk pace of the story was refreshing. I closed the back cover satisfied with a mid-morning snack of graphic reading.

    When initially approaching the book, I did not know what to expect. With the blue note set by his prior works, I thought this might be an exploration of Houdini's last days and unforeseen death. Instead the narrative picks up on a morning nearly a full decade before his mortality asserted itself and ends later that day, presenting a slice of Houdini's life, a splash of what made him great. And the people he relied upon to feed that greatness.

    Houdini: The Handcuff King is really a charming little story and I would pleasantly recommend it to anyone with an hour to kill.

    Rating:

    Click for free preview.


    Chiaroscuro

    Comic: Teh Drama.
    By Troy Little.
    234 pages.

    Years ago, before there was such a thing as Homeland Security, I used to visit my local comic shop every Wednesday to pick up any new comics that might have come in. Wednesday was important because it was new comics day, but there was a more important reason. My local would make an effort to get interesting works by indie publishers, little known pieces of particular wonder and delight. But not a big effort. It would typically get one of each of these books. So I would get there at lunch on Wednesday so that I would be the one to scoop up all the cool books.

    That was where I encountered Troy Little's Chiaroscuro. And loved it.

    The only problem was that either it stopped being produced or I wasn't getting there early enough. In any case, I had the first seven issues (save for #2 - which I was evidently too late to get). Still, even after six years or so, the memory of the book lingered and I would very occasionally check Amazon on the off chance that somehow the series survived and would be collected for me to purchase. And lo, the fruit of my diligence has paid off at last.

    Last night, I blew through the 234-page hardcover in a single sitting (it was easier maybe because I had already read half the book in its periodical form). It was worth it, but now I want more and hope I don't have to wait another six years.

    Chiaroscuro tells of a young man haunted. By ghosts, by mystery, by his inability to fill a canvas. Steve is a painter. Or so he says. He never actually does much to his canvas save stare at it in that understated horror that unlimited potential barters and trades in on a natural and daily basis. Along the way he hangs out with friends, gets drunk a lot, meets a girl, gets the crap kicked out of him, and mocks the artistry elite for their pretentious sanctimony.

    It's better than it sounds. A lot better. And the art is gorgeous. Little's lines are confident and well-placed. I know this review cannot be wholly unbiased as I approached the work with that kind of sentimental taste in my mouth that presents the kind of experience in which Little would have to suck pretty bad for me to give him a negative review here. Still, I hope to think that I really did enjoy this book as much as I enjoyed it.

    I only had one quibble: the story is not complete. At least I presume it isn't. It says "Book I" on the cover, which leads me to believe that this is merely Act I in a great story. Otherwise, I would have to reevaluate the story as some kind of experimental narrative. It would probably still succeed, but not as greatly. In any case, I can't wait for Book 2.

    Rating:

    Click for free preview.


    American Born Chinese

    Comic: Drama/Race Relations.
    By Gene Luen Yang.
    240 pages.

    It's funny that the most notable thing I can tell you about this book is that it's in colour.

    That might not strike you as odd, but really, for the type of story Yang tells, the comics industry has almost universally awarded such stories a black and white printing. If not autobiographical, American Born Chinese is the kind of story that might very well be.

    Examining the difficulty with which a child born in one country from parents of another country, the author explores the kind of dissatisfaction common to many in similar circumstances. The desire to blend in, the need to eliminate traces of heritage. I've never felt these things in my life, but through Yang's story, I could begin to understand in a manner other than pure academic assent.

    Yang weaves three narratives together in a masterful way and each sings of a different life's lesson. There is the story of the Monkey King (the classic Chinese figure), the story of Jin and his difficulty fitting into a school in which he is the only student of Chinese descent, and the story of Danny, who is plagued by his ridiculous cousin Chin-Kee (who is appears as a stereotyped caricature complete with affected speech - Ls for Rs and vice versa). Strangely, the Chin-Kee episodes actually carry a laugh track.

    It should be notable that the only bad thing I have to say about the book was that I didn't find it as good as its hype. Yang's book picked up a fistful of worthy awards last year. Not just Best Graphic Novel awards but several Best Book Awards.* As good as it was, I'd read better and while I would recommend it to anyone, I can't see myself reading it more than a couple more times if I live to seventy.

    *note: Best Book Awards from Publisher's Weekly, School Library Journal, and San Francisco Chronicle. Plus piles of other awards from elsewhere.

    Rating:

    Click for free preview.


    Labels: ,

    20071120

    Ever since high school, I've found it troubling both the freedom and adamance with which believers choose to describe God as being "outside of time." Think of it. Two things we really don't understand very much at all: the nature of God's eternality and the nature of time. And yet, the frequency with which we hear "God is outside of time" is awestriking. I even got into an argument with a teenage girl last week at the mall* who demanded that God not be in time.

    Look, people are allowed their pet philosophies, I suppose. But come on, how can we be dogmatic about something developed wholly apart from the revelation of Scripture? Further, does anyone even know what is meant by the turn "outside of time"? It sounds more like a bedtime story to make people comfortable with things beyond their ken than anything else.

    So what's the reason people feel the need to say God is outside of time anyway? I suspect it has to do with the groundless assertion that time was created when God created the universe, the idea being, I suppose that time is a property of matter. But isn't it just as sensible (or perhaps even more...) to guess that time is more properly a property of being? Angels, after all, are plausibly immaterial and I presume that they experience time, right? There is certainly some sense of history to them (creation, rebellion, judgment, etc.).

    I imagine that it makes perfect sense for temporality to be one of the attributes of God, since existence is an attribute of God and temporality is maybe an attribute of existence. The Monk suggested that one fear outside-time believers might have is that "stripping" God of his apart from time quality limits him and opens the door to open theism. I'll admit that such a fear may be behind some of the dogmatism but I'll also admit that its an unreasonable fear.

    Think of it this way. God is omniscient and ubiquitous and omnipotent. He has a plan and knows exactly what to do to effect that plan. And more, he has both the power and the presence to do everything he wants to in any moment. So really, what does it matter to such a being if he is in time or not. Everything still happens as he plans and when he plans.

    And it removes artificial philosophical constructs. Constructs like "outside of time."

    Now pay attention. I'm not saying that God isn't outside of time. Even though I'm saying it's reasonable to guess that he might be inside of time (whatever that means). At the end of the day, I'm just saying that we can't really state positively one way or another because there's no biblical support for the theory of outsidedness and even the philosophy is based on an understanding of time that is wholly deficient. So believe he's outside of time if you like, but don't ever use outsidedness as a premise supporting a conclusion you hope to rest anything important on. And don't expect me to jump on your applecart and ride to the faire towne of Ex Temporalis with you. Fair enough?


    NOTES:
    * It wasn't really at the mall. Who would have that kind of conversation at the mall?

    Labels: ,

    Monday, November 19, 2007

    20071119

    Lesson #1: When a girl tells you that her dog just died and you express sympathy and ask what happened and she assures you that it died of natural causes, don't go and drain the reservoir of sympathy you just filled by asking, "Natural causes? It was eaten by a larger animal?"

    Lesson #2: Don't blog about it.

    Labels:

    Thursday, November 15, 2007

    20071115

    In a piece* discussing the current Writers Guild Strike and the death of television, written by the head writer and co-creator of Lost (a piece linked pretty much everywhere), we find an amusing sentiment:

    I am angry because I am accused of being greedy by studios that are being greedy. I am angry because my greed is fair and reasonable: if money is made off of my product through the Internet, then I am entitled to a small piece.

    While I understand his point and agree that the corporate overlords are greedy rapscallions and scalawags (and maybe carpetbaggers too!), I'd like to focus on the author's sense of entitlement for a minute. "If money is made off of my product, then I am entitled to a small piece."

    The thing is, as nice and reasonable as that sounds, I'm not sure that it's true.

    Certainly it would be both good and nice for him to get money for continued profits made from something to which he partially contributed, but entitlement? Imagine if we applied this across the board. Ebay and pawn shops would immediately shut down because it would no longer be easy to resell items - as a portion of a seller's profit would have to be sent to the item's original producer (so that producer could apportion the dough to the suitable contributors to the product's creators). Airlines should be entitled to a portion of the money made from those who use their service to ship goods for sale or ferry businessmen to money-making meetings with clients. The guy who designed the vaguely slick interface for Amazon.com should receive residuals from every sale made through that site. And the growers of Limes should be granted a small piece of the action from every guy who used Coronas as moral lubrication to pry the pants off a normally sensible girl.

    After all. They're entitled.

    The fact of the matter is: sometimes, you're just payed to do a job. Once the job is done, it's not your business what happens to your work. I've done work for people and seen that work end up not being used at all. I've seen other things help net an employer a pretty penny. In either case though, my involvement and entitlement ended the moment my contractual obligation was fulfilled. I.e., the moment I finished the job.

    Look, it's fine if television writers want to renegotiate their deal. It's fine for them to want a bigger piece of the pie, more money. And if their employer wishes to give them such a deal, to cut them into a shared profit in hopes of, perhaps, inspiring a better product from them, then good for them. But to speak and act as if that cut of future profits is owed them, something they are entitled to, is an offense to reason, to reality, and to the rest of the working world who realizes that they are getting paid to do a job and any extra money on top of that which is contractually owed us is what we call a bonus.

    *note: any time you want to read a protected article on the New York Times website, just use guest1 as both your member ID and password for free access.

    Labels: ,

    Monday, November 12, 2007

    20071112

    If you could ride around on any animal as your noble steed, what you choose? See below for my choice.

    I choose you Manatee!

    Labels:

    Friday, November 09, 2007

    20071109

    Light posting week (as if you hadn't guessed) as I've just been to busy to really make my virtual presence known. Still, I did have time to make a cool bumper sticker for my Vespa.

    Alas, poor yorick...

    I'm sure you've all seen the sticker it's based on but for those who miss the Yorick Brown reference, remember this post?

    [by the way, the final volume (of ten) of Y: The Last Man should be coming out in the next couple months. As soon as I read it I'll let you know the verdict on the series, but the first nine volumes have been an incredible trip. One of the best conceived comics I've read.]

    Labels:

    Thursday, November 01, 2007

    20071101

    Just one today.


    Death Note

    Comic: Detective Thriller + a Box Full of Crazy.
    By Tsugumi Ohba (author) and Takeshi Obata (artist).
    12 volumes, 2480 pages.

    Over the past three weeks I've been burning through one of the most exciting reads I've come across in a while. Death Note is a seat-edged battle of wits that left me exhausted by the end. Heck, I was exhausted by the halfway mark.

    Let me start over. Death Note is a Japanese comic that tells it's story over the course of twelve volumes (on display now at your local Borders). If what I'm about to say sounds good but you don't feel like spending the eight dollars per volume, head to your local library - they almost certainly carry the books in the Young Adults section. In any case, it's worth your time. Here's why.

    Death NoteThe story begins when Ryuk, a death god (known in the story's mythology as shinigami), drops a death note into the human world in order to alleviate the boredom that oppresses his everlasting life. A death note is a special notebook possessed by shinigami that allow them to take the lives of humans whose names they write into the notebook. Ryuk's dropped notebook "happens" to fall into the path of Japan's top high school student, son of the chief of police, and all around genius, Light Yagami.

    After a couple tests of the book's authenticity and the boundaries of some of its rules (see rules below), Light decides that he will forge a new world, a utopia in which all criminals (those would would take advantage of the weakness of others) simply die. Rather quickly, the police around the world begin taking notice of the staggering number of criminals who have suddenly dropped dead of heart attacks. Suspecting foul play, they want to find the perpetrator because law-and-order and vigilantism have never been the best bed-fellows. And it doesn't help that Light has gained a popular following amongst the masses who dub him Kira (which sounds remarkably similar to the Japanese pronunciation of the English word, "killer"). So the authorities enlist the assistance of the world's greatest detective (an anonymous man known only as L) and he quickly narrows the range of suspects dramatically, instigating a pulse-pounding game of of cat-and-mouse between the figures - L vs. Kira.

    Death Note

    Initially, as exciting as the first couple volumes were, I had a hard time seeing how the story could sustain itself across twelve volumes. The key to Death Note's happy success is the absence of anything really resembling a status quo. The story and its elements are continually in flux. If things remained simple, I could see the book resolving in four or five volumes but everything is constantly moving, constantly changing. It was a fantastic read.

    And smart. The fact that you're reading about these very intelligent characters who think things through to incredible lengths only adds to the excitement. There were moments of revelation and counter-revelation that simply blew my mind. And then there are moments when you think the jig is up for one or more of the characters and then a flashback will reveal the would-be victims plan from the start and you get to see tables turn and over turn as these characters fight for their lives.

    Death NoteAnd even after that, the moral question that is explored by the book's author and artist really goes to lengths to get the reader thinking about means and ends and it's not at all clear who one should root for. It helps that Light, despite having an ego that won't quit, is entirely unselfish in his motivation. Death Note is almost a distillation of an important moral question.

    In short, I highly recommend this series to just about anyone.

    Rating:

    Oh, and as promised, here are some of the death note's rules:

    • If one visualizes a person's face and then writes their name in the death note, that person will die of a heart attack forty seconds later.
    • If one begins writing details regarding the circumstances of the person's death, any details added within six minutes and forty seconds will come true (such as, "____ trips while descending a staircase on the way to work and breaks his neck from his fall" or "____ chokes on lunch").
    • If the added circumstances are naturally not possible, the person will simply die of a heart attack (such as writing "____ will fall to his death from the top of the Empire State building on 7 November 2007" for a person locked away in a prison in Belgium).
    • If a person does not know a would-be victim's true name or face, the death note will not be effective.

    Those are just a few rules to whet your appetite.

    In case you missed it the first time:
    Rating:


    Labels: ,