20080207
I was going to write this rad post today unveiling a mystery of awesome corruption and deviance in the realm of youth fiction. I had evidence, you see. I was not certain what my conclusion would be but I did know there were questionable things afoot.
Then I really looked at my evidence.
As it turns out, while there still may be some shennanigans, the evidence is not as strong I thought it was when my comparison of the two exibits was made without the two pieces side by side. In any case, here's the deal.
This morning as I perused the comics news (a morning ritual by which I ascertain the health of the subculture and discover things to which one should pay heed), I noticed that Evan Kuhlman's Wolf Boy has been optioned for the cinema by the Weinstein Co. As I read, I noticed the book's jacket art and thought, Waitasec! Something looked way too familiar. See, The Monk has been reading, just finished, and greatly enjoyed Nate Wilson's recent book (also aimed at a youth market), Leepike Ridge. I haven't read the book myself (save for the first chapter), but the book jacket by Tim Jessel is pretty engrained in my mind since, for the past week, it has stood placeholder for The Monk's face during many of the evening hours.
Something seemed fishy to me. And here it was:
The thing that set me off was having Jessel's Converse-clad feet ingrained in my mind for how poorly they were rendered. The just looked awkward there, more rounded than long and with strange bulges beginning immediately as the rubber toe ends. I had been thinking, Who would draw Chuck Taylors like that? So when I encountered similarly rendered Converse-clad feets on the cover of Wolf Boy, I didn't think, Wow, someone else drew sucky-looking shoes. Instead, I thought, Wow, are those shoes clip art or did one artist rip off the other? Or is it the same artist just going for an easy paycheck?
So, naturally, I put together a post about it. But while gathering evidence, I thought I should overlay the art in order to see just how alike the two pairs of shoes actually were. The thing is, they are close but not exact.
There may still have been some copying* going on, but I suppose we'll never know. It does seem overly coincidental that two youth-market books bear such thematically similar covers within the space of a year (Wolf Boy was published in 2oo6** and Leepike Ridge in 2oo7), but since I don't know the illustrater for the prior book and the art is slightly different, I have little case for conspiracy theorizing.
Wish me better luck next time!
*note: or the more tasteful homaging, which really amounts to copying but is a friendlier way of saying it.
**note: Wolf Boy no longer features the badly-drawn-shoe cover in its current form.
Labels: graphics