Vexation #12: Ignorance as Fuel for Dogma
*sigh* Somebody named Mark Byron (who has many degrees) apparently has no better understanding of Halloween than Chuck Smith or your common household appliance. There's so much fodder here that I'm not certain where to begin. Perhaps I'll simply restate some of his hyper-reactive sillinesses and let that lead where that will lead. Because of time constraints, I'll only be able to broach a few of the problems.
The first problem of Halloween is that it gets a week's worth of free airtime to Wiccans and other "good witches." Paganism gets to say it isn't as bad as it's made out to be, is older than Christianity and deserves respect.
While I can't really comment on media coverage here - as I don't have television - this seems more an issue of perception than the holiday itself. For one, Halloween isn't necessarily anymore a Wiccan holiday than is New Year's. This goes back to my abundantly stated theory of holidays, but celebrations (even those broadly embraced by society) are without a doubt of individual import.
Take Christmas. To some, it is the celebration of the advent of God incarnate. To others, it is a celebration of peace and good will. To the holiday's founders, it was a celebration of the Winter solstice. To me, Christmas is a celebration of friends and good times and love for humanity. So it is with Halloween.
To some, it is a time to cop free candy. To others, it is a time to play dress up and masquerade as someone else for an evening. To Wiccans, it may very well be a high holy day. But so what? To me, Halloween is a day to celebrate friends and good times and a love for humanity.
If the media focuses on one single view of a holiday (something I don't remember it ever doing when I had television), then the media is where you ought point your finger. The media also focuses somewhat on the popular legend of Jolly Old Saint Nick nearbouts Christmastime - yet we don't point the finger at Christmas and call it a day of the devil. Neither should we for Halloween.
The second problem is that it gives the negative supernatural a good name.
Maybe I missed something in Halloween 101. Not only is Halloween rarely about the supernatural, but even when things like ghosts and bats and Frankenstein monsters and jack-o-lanterns are used as decorations, they do not imply in any respect a belief for good or ill in supernatural forces.
I love watching a good spooky ghost story like The Devil's Backbone or Sixth Sense. Even Ghostbusters and A Christmas Carol are worth an occasional glance. But that doesn't mean I have any vested belief one way or another in the events or ideas portrayed in the tales. As it happens, I do believe in a supernatural realm and that unexplainable things happen at unexpected times - and my beliefs about such reflect a biblical frame. But I don't go to sleep at night fearing Gozer the Gozerian or believing that "I see dead people."
I carve jack-o-lanterns every year - in fact, I carve them many times throughout the year: Thanksgiving jack-os, Christmas jack-os, Easter jack-os, and even the occasional Valentine's jack-o-lantern. I seem to remember that once upon a dream, people used them in a mock celebration, supposedly lighting the way for spirits (or frightening them off depending on the lore), but I just make 'em because they look cool.
I really don't know anyone (excepting a few fearful, young Christians who have been suitably brainwashed by ignorant rhetoric) who actually grants any power to the forces supernatural on Halloween. But again, it's all in your perspective. I suppose there might actually be those who celebrate fertility and pray to fertility gods on Easter. But more's the loss for them, eh?
The third problem with Halloween is that people will treat the negative supernatural as a fun fiction. If Satan can't get people to worship him, the next best thing he can do is to get people to ignore him, so that he can do his work in peace. If demons, vampires and exorcisms are just something you see in the movies or TV, then they are tone-deaf to the spiritual dimension of life.
I dunno. I've heard this critique before and it just doesn't ring true. Most people have an innate ability to distinguish between fantasy and reality - especially the greater the distinction between the two (e.g., it's easier to recognize Star Wars or Harry Potter as purely unreal than it is something like Speed or L.A. Confidential). I think far more dangerous are fantastic tales that purport to represent - at least to some degree - reality. Books such as This Present Darkness and Left Behind are just as fantastic and just as irrepresentative of what is as their secular counterparts, but because of the authors' worldviews, Christians are far more apt to take these fictions seriously. I remember hearing people speaking of spiritual warfare in identical terms to Peretti's make-believe world - and that was scary.
Really though, the problem is not the fantasy. It's how people react to the fantasy. So long as readers (or viewers, in the case of filmworks) keep their feet firmly planted on the ground, there is no problem with the circumstance. But if a work's audience is floating away into faery land, that audience should seek serious psychological help to overcome their issues with reality.
Again, the problem is not with the fantasy. It is with individuals reacting wrongly toward the fantasy.
Well, Mark continues, but at root, he seems to carry a fundamental misunderstanding of holidays in general, this holiday in particular, and the place of fantasy in the life of society and the individual. He also, like many fundamentalists before him, seems to embrace a disturbing willingness to demonize the innocuous. I hope this is just a phase he's going through and that he won't convert to many to his cause... I hope.